OK BUT YOU HAVENT ANSWERED BY QUESTION. WHAT SHOULD I GET FROM NET FOR RAM TO EXIST. IN THE NET THERE ARE MORE SITES AND HINDU AUTHORS WHO CLAIM THE NON EXISTANCE OF RAM.. ACCORDING TO RAMAYAN. 1) RAM WAS A WOMANIZER 2) RAM WAS IMPOTENT 3) SITE LOVED RAVANA 4) RAM USE TO EAT BEEF 5) RAM COULD NOT PROTECT HIS WIFE 6) RAM AS A GOD HAD TO TAKE HELP OF AN ANIMAL HANUMAN WHOSE EXISTANCE IS A INSANITY. 7) RAM HAD TO KILL HANUMANS BROTHER IN RETURN FOR HANUMANS HELP 8) HANUMAN COULD FLY AND CARRY MOUNTAIN THEN WHY NOT HANUMAN TAKE RAM TO LANKA THEN TO KEEP HIS WIFE WITH RAVANA FOR 14 YEARS.. 9) ACCORDING TO RAMAYAN SITA FELL IN LOVE WITH RAVANA AND WHEN RAM LIBERATED HER FROM RAVANA SITE HAD RAVANAS PHOTOS IN HER BOSSOM THIS IS ALL ACCORDING TO RAMAYAN AND I HAVE READ IT ... WHEN SITAS SISTER CAME AND TOLD RAM ABOUT THIS RAM WENT TO SITAS HOUSE AND FOUND SITE WITH RAVANAS PHOTO ON LEAF HELD IN HER BOSSOM. SITA WAS IMPRESSED WITH RAVANS PALACE... THE MOMENT SHE SAW IT AND FELL IN LOVE WITH HIM WHEN RAM ASKED SITAS FIDELITY SITA COULD NOT ANSWER AND SHE WENT UNDERGROUND... NOW LAV AND KUSH RAM;S SON ALSO IT IS SAID THAT THEY WERE THE SONS OF RAVANA... RAM HAD MANY DEVDASIS. SITA HER SELF TOLD TO RAM THAT HE WAS IMPOTENT.. SO LORD RAM LOOK MORE OF A MAN AND RAVANA LOOKS MORE LIKE GOD..
