Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
NO ram no sanskrit theory proves no Ram
by Ramasubbu on Oct 10, 2007 02:57 PM

Sankrit did not figure among oldest languages.
Sankrit being very modern phenomenon and latest among all historical languages. So how Ram of 17 million years old era can be related with Sankrit or Vedic era. There is only one possibility either Ram exist or Sankrit/vedic culture existed. if Sandkrit/vedic existed then Ram was for sure a imaginary character which was never a reality. (Vedic blunder)

Ugaritic 15th c. BC
Proto-Canaanite 14th c. BC
Phoenician 11th c. BC
Paleo-Hebrew 10th c. BC
Aramaic 8th c. BC
Brahmi & Indus Harappan 6th c. BC
Tibetan 7th c.
Khmer/Javanese 9th c.
Hebrew 3rd c. BC
Syriac 2nd c. BC
Nabatean 2nd c. BC
Arabic 4th c.
Pahlavi 3nd c. BC
Avestan 4th c.
Greek 9th c. BC
Etruscan 8th c. BC
Latin 7th c. BC
Runes 2nd c.
Ogham 4th c.
Gothic 3th c.
Armenian 405
Glagolitic 862
Cyrillic 10th c.
Samaritan 6th c. BC
Iberian 4th c. BC


    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
What ASI has to say about Ram Sethu