some very vicious stuff has got written here in these columns by some hindu baiters as also some anti nationalists ( wanting to create schisms and divide the nation, including north south, FC/OBC/BC castes and so on ) . My simplest question is who gave anyone the right to abuse sri Rama or even question his existence? to what extent can freedom of speech be abused ? Religious beliefs are matters of faith ; Those who do not know about our religion or faith should desist from making comments and no matter how much proof or justifications one gives, the instigator/mudslinger will always keep on debunking the claim and repeating the same question again and again. In a world where there remains no proof of events that occurred a few minutes back, what kind of proof can possibly exist about something that happenned thousands of years back? Sri Rama's biography was written by Valmiki otherwise even that(his life) would not have got known to mankind.And how many people live with the intention of leaving proofs for posterity ? Do even all the citizens of this country registered or leave a proof of their existence after their death? Sri Rama was a noble being and fools are those that are maligning him or taking potshots at him(cowards hiding behind anonymity in these blogs ).I once again request rediff that kindly put in some mechanism to moderate/validate the stuff that gets written here(unless and offcourse if rediff itself is prejudiced against hindus and likes creating schisms)
