Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
We denied Ram 55 years ago!
by nandu rajurikar on Sep 15, 2007 04:42 PM



In 1952, we accepted our Constitution 7 declared ourselves as a socialist secular republic with adult franchise. On that day we refused Rama & the Ramrajya.

There were elements in Hindu society then, who wanted to bring Ram Rajya. We strongly disagreed & dumped the idea of Ram Rajya. By doing that we did not dishonour India in any way, actually we did India proud.

Rama does not qualify to become our ideal & no one should ever try to force him upon us. Rama does not equate with India. India is much greater than Rama. Therefore, donot cry in the name of Rama!

As for Setu Samudram, it is an issue to be sorted out by experts on merits of the case alone. No foul cries of religious sentiments should be allowed to blackmail the nation.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India