Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Views on
by on Jan 12, 2008 02:08 AM

I would like to congratulate Tarun Vijay for taking an extremist view against Sonia Gandhi, and the UPA per se. With the mighty power of pen, he has incorporated many similes and metaphors, and has been able to deliver (let me now come directly to the point) a seemingly convincing report on how always, %u201CUPA PEOPLE%u201D are anti-Hinduism, and the honest BJP is not! My dear friend should know that a reader ignorant of the concerned issue (that of UPA toying with the feelings of Hindus) may fell in his trap of words, but a well-versed reader of the same issue can read in-between the lines. If the so-called history of BJP is dig out, it would be the BJP and not UPA, who will stand in the witness box for their ever changing statements on the similar issues. Remember Mr. Advani%u2019s forceful slogan %u201CKasam khuda ki khaate hein, hum mandir yahin banaenge%u2026%u201D and then his utter silence over the same issue??!! This is one such example, and off course the list is endless. And as far as the affidavit is concerned, I advise my friend to revise his knowledge, and use %u201Cwisdom%u201D rather than just %u201Ccollecting facts%u201D. The proposal for changing Ram Sethu had been proposed by the NDA government under Mr. Vajpayee%u2019s reign, and the same was cleared by the then Central Government. When the issue re-opened at the time of UPA%u2019s rule, the responsible Government filed an affidavit to take back the words of the burning issue of %u201Cchanging Ram Sethu.%u

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India