The Rama's bridge has created so much political controversy and people are missing the crucial lesson history is teaching us here. It is the belief and faith of people that really make mythology sound true. From purely archeological point of view many historians, scientists and even NASA (from where the original images were obtained) have debunked the theory of this geographic anamoly ever being man made. But when you look at the pictures and you know a little bit about Ramayana then you will really appreciate that there is some truth behind all those myths. Dwaraka excavation stirred up similar controversies and religious conflicts. If Rama and Krishna really were Aryan kings who ruled India long time ago then why cant you accept that these relics are just remnants of a lost civilization. If you cannot accept them as gods at least show some respect for their great science and cultural achievements as portrayed in their stories. Before mankind started documenting evidence in the form of scriptures the story was passed down by word of mouth through several generations. Just because there is no solid archeological evidence we cannot come to the conclusion that these things never existed. As for the hate comment on Brahmins and Aryan supremacy theory - I strongly object to such hate comments. If you are a good person then you have to argue in good logic putting forward decent arguements and not just rub dirt on ancient people who lived in Indian subcontinent.
