Sir, you are jumbling. Earlier and first version of Veda never mentioned anything about Siva.
Brahmi and sanskrit had no connection. So Devnagari cannot be connected to Brahmi. Brahmi can only be connected to tamil. if you do not know this basic fact you can't work on this subject. Vedic existence was nil in harappan civilization which is 5000 years old. It was brahmi in harappan civilization. That time vedic religion or vedic intrustion did not come to this land. Please stop coloring everything with vedic brush. If you uncover any dravidian temple of south ( which were grabbed by Aryan brahmins) you will find Jain idol. Give a try. This fact cannot be blunder something which is rightly proven in no time. Well Varadaperumal, Kapaleeshwar, Venkateshwara are not Aryan gods, then how they become Vishnu's avatar? can you confirm this? How they came in the hands of Aryan brahmins. Well why dravidian and aryan gods are different even today, except that there is fake networking link called "avatar" which was trick to grab temples from dravidian hands.
EMS NNN --- you are too confused even with basic chronology of history. how can vedic brush can prove dravid, siva and jains? who are much beyond the vedic existence and can be proved with archaeological evidence.
You cannot give one single proof except quoting things from mythical epics.
