Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:@ Ramsubbu
by Ramasubbu on Oct 06, 2007 02:38 PM

EMS-NNN OR SHARMAJI'S AVATAR, you cannot give even one single archaeological evidence of existence of vedic brush before 2000 years. You cannot give even single evidence of Ram or Sanskrit or Brahmin in Harappan civilization.

all that you have is to quote things lifted from vedas, or mythology. I have archeological and historical evidences. Even without these with contradiction in vedas itself I can prove there was no Ram, no Sanskrit, there was no siva in vedic cult, and there was no Ramayana at all. Forget about Ram sethu. Same thing has been filed as affidavit by ASI officers. See you cannot prove your point by threat or mass belief or superstitions. World demands for proof and scientific result which you have none.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India