okie my name is Rama subbu and I am fighting my shadow. What about Satyamurthy Iyer who is biggest lier in the world? Or Mr Ramalingam, is he real phallu or Ram? Or Ram singh- Is he real Ram plus lion? Or Mr. chaturvedi has to know four vedas? they don;t even know one Veda.
Bottom line is there was no Ram which could be proved by science, history or any cross reference from scholars or history of another country. Dravid research and references of truthful nature are well understood by Germany universities, Canadian Universities, Chinese universities with proper paperwork. Ram or Sanskrit didn't even exist in India before 2000 years ago. Show me one proof and i will do anything for you. Don;t just fight with your own opinion or mass opinion, sentiments, emotions or epics written by brahmins. What if Harry potter epic found after 1000 years later and people will start believing that Harry potter did exists before 1000 years. So if Ramayana written by Tulsi talks about Ram, it doesn't mean he existed as much as existence of harry potter. Characters of harry potter epic and ramayana epic are same as far as scientific, historical evidences are concerned. Archaeological officers rightly said epics cannot be considered basis for existence of Ram and Ram sethu.
Well wittingly i would tell you something . all gods created by Brahmins was basically to get Laddus and Pedas on the name of Ram and other gods, so they don;t have to really work. it was theory, epics and social fear
