EMS -NNN QUOTES: Thirukural, tolkappiyam and other sangam works ,chilappatikaram all dates to 1st or 2nd century BCE.
Okay, even these are claimed by brahimns/hindus/vedic gurus as their work? Tell me how. Above work was not in Sankrit nor it was by Brahmins or hindus. It was dravidian work and most likely by Jain civlization. Please note that Jainism existed in India much much before vedic relgion came in South India and rest of India. There was no traces of Vedic religion in south India till Pallava kings. Do you know Pallava kings were Jains and most of Tamil kings, These facts are hardly published but well researched by ASI. Well why do Brahmins call Kanchipuram, Mahabalipuram as Hindu and Arjun (pandav) centres, when they were built by Jain king Pallavas.? It is habit of brahmins/vedic culture to claim every dravidian property as their own. first lesson for you:: Dravidians were never ever Hindus OR Vedic. Later Dravidians were included in lowest strata of Vedic religion as Shudras and Rakshashas after their heritage and temples were taken over and converted by Brahmin forces. No wonder why dravidians hate Aryans and Aryan gods. Dravidian gods are even today do not belong to Hindus. They are just renamed as Avatar of Vishnu etc. Say for eg. Thirupati Lord Venkateshwara or Lord Varadaperumal, Nagaraja Temple in Nagercoil,or Meenakshi temple in Madurai or any temple in Kanchipuram- who were normal Jain gods later renamed as vishnu avatar, or Siva avatar after Brahm
