EMS-NNNNN. You are creating the question and answering by yourself. Did I say Tamil existed before 2000 years. Ofcourse Tamil was evolved from Brahmi. and basis for brahmi was Harappan language. There is no where Sanskrit in any part of Indian continent existed. Thirukural and any literature of that time was in Brahmi, so how do you claim it to be Brahmin property. Why do you claim Thiruvalluvar was Brahmnic or Hindu property? Hinduism or any form of Hinduism didn't exist in 1CENTURY B.c. during Thiruvalluvar. Is it not a historical lie. Why did you want to color thiruvalluvar with Brahmnic, vedic paint? Thiruvalluvar had nothing to do with Hindu Gods. Archaeology department and Professor Dr. Santhalingam, senior director of ASI has clearly mentioned in his research work that Thiruvalluvar was Jain and dravid and his work never belonged to Hinduism or so called hinduism which is present form of Vedic religion. Why did brahmin claim Thiruvalluvar , thirukural and South Indian temples as Hindus or brahmnic? It was because they wanted to control temples and wanted to label it as Vedic. So they used another trick of Avatarisation of dravidian gods into Aryan avatars.
