Sanskrit has no evidence of its existence before 2000 years. Brahmi and its roots are more than 5000 years old for which archaelogical evidences are avaialble in Harappan civilization. Out of 100 sites in tamilnadu and srilanka, none has any evidence of vedic religion or sanskrit.
Moreover your kshatriya , viashya theory is all bogus, that came along with Aryans. Among dravids there was no caste system. Jainism was not Aryan phenomenon.
Finally I would say Aryans were barbaric nomads who came from eastern or central europe which is proven, because there is no proof found in any civilization here of their existence and Ram's existence. So just do not rake up stories based on your knowledge of Vedas or vedic imaginary stories. Dr. Emmanuel in his book DRavid lineage has dig the history of Nadars. Nadars who were Jains and their traditions are dating back to 4000 years as per him. Jainism and Jain followers were dravidians. Sir who told you that Mahavira was Kshatriya? Did any history or archaeological guru told you , or you are just giving harry potter version. Please be logical when you argue. don't drag your opinion based on vedic paint brush. Go with relevant facts. Please visit caves of Madurai hills, there are 56 ASI controlled sites and learn few details to brush up your knowledge. If you can historical prove existence of sanskrit, and Ram , I would do anything for you.
You can't challege my research of 15 years unless you have some evidences. Well I a
