Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:MESSAGE FOR RAMASUBBU
by Ramasubbu on Oct 05, 2007 12:50 PM

HOW Can I challenge Brahmins, I am sure you are not going to convince me with as if Murugan was 999th avatar of Vishnu, as much as Gandhiji was 111th Avatar of Shiva and John F kennedy was 1112th Avatar of Lord Hanuman. What you want to challenge me. Lord Murugan was purely dravidian propery , no where in Rig vedas there is mention of Murugan or Lord Siva. Both belonged to Jainism which were later colored as Brahminic gods. Siva never existed in any ancient Veda. Read veda properly. Siva is none other than Lord Adinatha. Harappan civilization only talks about Adinath aka Siva. I am telling you this with various scientific evidences as well as cross references from Chinese history and western scholars. Moreover I do not need even research or cross reference to prove Murugan. I can just prove with two contradicting version of Veda and Ramayana that Ram never existed as well as Siva was Dravid god(jain god) and harappan civilization was dravid culture, as well as Veda and Vedic religion came to India much before Siva and Murugan existed. Refer a book written by Dr. Emmanuel by title "Dravid Lineage" which has 35 years of reasearch work done by him. As per him most of south Indian gods are colored with Vedic paint and Gods have been converted to Avatars of Vishnu all around 8th century A.D.
Before Pallava kingdom only jainism existed in South India and there is no mention of Vedic gods here. the temple you see in south India were originally Jain temples. This is quite eviden

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India