Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:Friend Ramsubbu
by Ramasubbu on Oct 11, 2007 03:54 AM

So you mean to say ram existed only before 3700 years ago? Because ram spoke only sanskrit with sita . Okay is there any evidence of Sankrit that it was 3700 years ago? does britanica has any valid archaeological evidence as Brahmi and other ancient langugaes had some kind of seals, epigraphy, stone scripts. what does sankrit have? I think Sankrit even used indian scripts to perform their half baked nature. They took help of dravidians to call it complete...

so you prove that Ram was only 3700 years old . thank god i don't have to go back to 17 million years to prove ram, when he spoke Sanskrit....

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Denying Ram is denying India