Tarun, through his excellently written article has hardly left any room for us to write anything about the cunning and ever-conspiring government ruled by an Italian Christian behind a nincompoop Sardarji and spineless politicians including the barking only dogs in the guise of Communists. Credit to Sonia? My foot! This is only a ploy by the greedy and power hungry Congress-Communist-DMK-Etc combine to divide the already fragmented society further and further their ends. Alas, even the opposition is badly fragmented & is in disarray posing no threat to the present govt. The govt seems to be suffering from a perpetual foot-in the mouth disease, the other great example being the Tirumala Saga where the Christian CM declared that all the seven hills do not belong to the Lord. The fool he is, Chandrababu Naidu failed to anything concrete about declaring the seven hills as autonomous during his regime. What is use of crying now?
Back to the subject: The Supreme Court should dismiss the petition and should not allow either destruction of the bridge or any activities around it as to prevent any harm to the bridge. It should also keep in mind the evidence that the bridge reduced the impact of the Tsunami that occurred recently saving several lives and properties.
The question is not whether Lord Rama existed or not, but the faith of more than 800 million people from India and across the globe should be respected.
