Quoting from the above report: "It was mentioned in the controversial affidavit that there was no evidence to prove the existence of Lord Ram". It is totally irresponsible reporting. The affidavit said that there was no HISTORICAL evidence to prove the eixstence of Lord Ram. There are other thousands of proof to establish that Lord Ram did exist, but those cannot be placed in front of the judiciary.
Much furore on this discussion board on the subject for the past couple of days the result of irresponsible reporting by rediff report writers. Much mud had been slung, passions raised, religions and peoples abused.
