My honoured friend seems to have misjudged the whole situation in his mainly fictitious essay. He has drawn a totally wrong conclusions from the seemingly disorderly situation in Pakistan. Pakistan being subject to devastation by one push by a neighbour (obviously India was in the author's mind) is nothing more than a wishful thinking on the part of the author.
1) Relegion is the gretest binding force that humanity has ever known.
2) Pakistanis are linked together in the relationship of brotherhood and this feeling is by no means local. On one side the author talks of the 'Muslim clan' and on the other side states that religion has nothing to do with it, which is quite absurd.
3) The frustration of Muslim clan is due to no other reason than the brutality of their opponents on their Muslim sisters and brothers. It is a sign that Muslims (not including the political diplomacies of their rulers) are united and feel for one another's griefs and tribulations.
4) The argument that Pathans were converted from Buddhism and Punjabis from Hinduism is totally out of place. Does the author want us to believe that the religions that their forefathers once followed still have some effect on them and the religion that they have been adherents of for generations has none?
