Its not a question of withdrawal of an affidavit maa'm. Its a question of lopsided attitude of the government towards a faith. This has been a policy of the congress to divide people by creating religious controversies. Remember the constitutional ammendment done by Rajiv gandhi to deny a muslim woman her rights to divorce aluminy? (The famous shahabano case). To slap us on our face and then say 'sorry' is just not right. It hurts. There is no law against blashphemy in our country. If it is needed for economic reasons to make the sea deep at Setubandha, the Government should do it. But to question the very existance of Lord Rama, by our own Government makes Hinduism a laughing stalk in the whole world. What is that religion, whose elected representatives themselves consider it as folklore or myth? Already Hinduism is looked down upon as a culture of idol worship. Now if our own Government swears in its apex court through an affidavit that Rama is nothing but a mythical figure then whole world will call us Pagan on our face. My opinion is that if you need to reconstruct something at the setubandha, go ahead but please dont hurt our feelings. Is this because our country has a sikh prime minister?
