How has the Centre arrived at this conclusion? As somebody submitted in a response, shouldn't we ask the ASI Director C Dorjee that because we are not able to see any evidence of his great great grandfather's existence we feel that his great great grandfather did not exist? And by that same token how can anybody establish the evidence of Jesus or Muhammad or any of the other incarnations or prophets? Even if one has so called evidence, like Turin's shroud, somebody can dispute the evidence and say that the evidence has been doctored. So basically it boils down to having faith in the source of evidence. Faith has to be of course logical and reasonable, not just blind. Sitting in India, one reads that there was a big hurricane in Florida killing hundreds. We accept that news because we have faith in the newspaper reporting it, that it is providing authentic news. The normal man who reads newspapers does not go to actually verify the events reported. Similarly one has to be pious to have faith in God and the scriptures. People who are too materialistic, unscrupulous generally have no fatih in a higher purpose, in a higher controller or God. But actually being a secular government, it is the government's duty to at least provide equal treatment of all religions, to provide equal support - moral and financial for temples, churhces etc. The modern disease is that in the name of secularism the governemnt is completely inactive in religious matters, leading to moral and spiritual d
