Fine, someone wants to do some work in the water to reduce the journey time for some ships. Let them study the ecological and economic aspects and make a decision. If it is not man made, is it good to destroy nature? We seem to believe so. Is this work really important? Are there any benefits for taking up this work? Is anything going to cost me 1 re less because of this? Let them first prove the economic benefits before raising a question on existence of Ram. Hindu baiting seems to have become a good past time for politicians. Will our "secular" PM apologize to the nation about his governments actions in hurting Hindu's sentiments? Highly unlikely.
While we are on the subject, did the ASI come up with proof that Mumtaz is indeed buried in the "taj mahal" before deciding to take up the restoration work with "mud packs"? It is not a wonder to me.
Sonia Gandhi has asked for the affidavit to be changed. Are we to believe that initial affidavit was submitted without her knowledge? And is the ASI affidavit on behalf of the Congress party or the Government? What exactly is our esteemed Prime Minister doing at this time? Complete silence seems quite odd. Why are the left parties so silent? Pride of the nation is not so important I guess.
Why is Man-made more sacrosanct than natural formation? There is no better architect than Nature. Nature builds for long term sustenance and very aesthetically. Let us spend more time and energy in conserving nature rather than destroying i
