see, i think the ramayana and mahabharata are the greatest philosophical and spiritual texts available to man, but honestly, it cant be true. for a court to recognize anything, it needs evidence so theres nothing the court can do about this..everyone knows that half the politicians are murderers but the court wont recognise that cuz it doesnt have evidence, so thats a limitation of the judicial system..ramayana is a mythological text..maybe some of those events are true, but the entire thing cannot possible be true..people dont realise that maybe the bridge existed even when valmiki wrote the ramayana and maybe he thought that he could incorporate that into the story..just because the bridge is there, it doesnt prove that ramayana was true.that said, it doesnt matter whether it was true story or not.the universal, cosmic truths contained in those texts are unmatched.and the govt cannot destroy the bridge because it holds great value for those who want to believe.if they want to destroy the bridge, then they might as well go destroy all temples and mosques cuz God is everywhere, and not just in temples and mosques.they can ban astrology and vaastu as well.they can ban people who want to believe in something that may not necessarily be true, but they believe in it because they want to..they should also ban the concept of heaven and hell..see how stupid our govt is, trying to destroy something just because there is no empirical evidence to support a belief
