Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Its fact
by Chezh Iyan on Sep 12, 2007 05:49 PM

What the ASI says is true, i have good faith in Hinduism, have visited many temples of Vaishanavites (108)and many Saivite (274) and doing research on various Yugas. Have personaly visited Dhanushkodi twice(from where the rock formation are said to be found) and witnessed changes of this place which has happend in last 10 years. I will put up a fact. Certain sea shore areas of Tamilnadu did not get affected by Tsunami, namely Tiruchendur, Rameswaram and Danushkodi are a few to mention. The effect of Tsunami was felt on Male shore of Rameswaram and not on female shore on which side the said rock formations are said to be their. If it was man made it would have been 1000 of rocks or layers of rocks as we see in (visualised) picutres, Cinema and in TV cinema. Where as this is a large boulder like Great rock of Gibraltar found during diging suez canal. Where as now we have found the great rock of Sethu which over the priod of time has not been destroyed or damaged in the last Tsunami or previous Tsunami's. (We have records in Tamil literature about mention of Tsunami) I cant say the formation of the said rocks are still intact, due to it natural strength which are deep rooted in the sea. These natural rocks has fully taken the preasure force of Tsunami waves at various periods. I'm refering to the happenings of the female shore which is on the south eastern side. Where as on the male shore (500 mts opposite to this female shore) the sea did pull back and did create 2 huge killer

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'