Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Indian subcontinent belonged to Hindus legally.
by Milind on Sep 12, 2007 08:43 PM

Oh the answer is simple.

The eitire Indian sub-continent was occupied by Hindus till the Mughal invaders (and Britishers) came and converted your ancestors. Ram temple was destroyed and converted to a Baabri Masjid. So was Krishna temple in Mathura.

The current LEGAL system which you are referring to was not established when the Mughals invaded India. Not that the plundering Mughals would have cared if it existed. Jizia tax for Hindus is a fact not fiction. What legal system did they follow ?

Your ancestors who were forcefully converted and burried instead of burnt must be cying in their graves. And dont curse them since your very existance is because of them. All the genetic and physical features of Indian Muslims are local and not Arabic. Scientifically speaking, it takes more than 10,000 years for such features to coincide the local geography.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'