Hi guys....Ram may or may not have existed...but wats the problem with a bridge? If Ram existed,then he was a man right?A man is not above other men,but a man reaches a higher pedestal by his actions.We remember Ram as a character more supreme than other beings,because of his actions.So why put his name to shame, when we start fighting against a construction of a bridge?
I think its stupid,and the ASI is correct to say what it found was correct.And Even if there was a bridge made by Ram,so what?The bridge between Sri Lanka and India will only improve economic ties between the countries......n I dont think RAM wil object to that!
Guy start being a little modern.....Ram will be very embarassed to see(if he is seeing) that some guys are still stuck with concepts that he set,say, some million years ago!
I think he was modern and was acting according to the rules of his period, n I believe he will also respect us if we too made changes according to the times in which we live!
