What i fail to understand is that when the leaders of two political parties have decided what they wish to do next, what is the sense in them discussing the move and seeking approval from third and forth countries like the US and the UK? What does this prove? What is this an indication of?
The US and the UK decide who will be in the ruler's seat for countries all over the world? What does this make the US and the UK? Would it not make them dictators?
Agreed that the US and the UK do more for poverty upliftment and society benefitment than any other country in the world, but isn't it mandatory for them to do that since they lead the pack of Superpowers of the World.
I wish, just to state here that, emerging countries such as India and Pakistan need to restructure their priorities as well as their individualities if they are to seriously contribute to the development of their self. I india agrees to sign a nuke pact with the US, it makes sense because it can be looked upon as a safety measure even though it may have some shady shadows dangling by itself too, however, these variables are tangibles.
But when Bhutto wishes to return to power, why should she discuss this with the Foreign Secretary of London? Are the US and the UK going to decide who will next rule us on the basis of the levels of their cooperation with the US and the UK?
This is a clear indication that these so called politicians that we elect are only interested in their personal enrichment.GROW UP!
