By the way in india maxists are actively involed in writing history from the day we got independence.In all our text books history starts with mouryas you know why because cahndra gupta is mentioned in greek history,not because of mauryas own written history as it is also written in puranic form.Had alexarder not invaded india our maxists historians would have even regected maurays too.It is very clear that chradra upta with the help of chanakya threw Nandas from power who had ruled magdya 1000yrs,but we are never told about these nandas any where at all,as if they never had any history.their are many proofs for mahabarat and ramayan to have taken place ,if you are really interested please do google on it,you will find many things of which you were unknown. Asi has repeatedly said that they have never studied the ram sthu to begin with,which was also reported in many media(media bith news and print in india are controlled by missionery and evelangial,though they have put brahmin faces in front)Lastly for your brahmin writting history,yes you are right nearly all maxixts historian are brahmins,we have our own brain to think for ourself wheter to beleive them or not,and for that matter many of us dont beleive them,neither do we beleive the media which has nothing positive to show about hindus and hinduism.
