Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:Is it right to say ALL TERRORIST ARE MUSLIMS
by Arjun Periyar on Oct 31, 2007 01:06 PM

A. Why you have not mentioned the terrorists who burnt alive 58 train passengers & in turn triggered the riots? This selective descrimination shows your hypothetical thnking. This is problem of educated muslims in general!
B. Tiger group in Lanka is not fighting for the religous cause & hence its dimension is limited to Lanka only.
C. Naxals are not religous groups & their influence is limited only to the local areas.
D. Hitler not Muslim & hence was more honest to his motherland. He faught the war for his country & religion was never an issue.
E. The objective of world war I & II was to gain more teritory & it was not the destruction of civilization. Here it must be mentioned that Hitler did not destroy Paris eventhough he attacked France. This is in sharp contrast to almost all Muslim unvaders in India who destroyed the civilization completely.
F. Godse Kild Gandhiji only physically. He was virtually assasignated by Muslim league through direct action when Muslim league activists slaghtered Hindus for the demand of separate state on tne basis of religion.
G. Rajiv Gandhi's example is totally irrelevant in this context.
H. Bhagat Singh fought for his motherland. Don't insult the country by camparing him with terrorists.
I. Media is not giving false information for the recent events.

The biggest difference between terrorism on the name of religion & other types of terrorism is the circle of influence. Terrorism on the name of religion is the most harmful to the ent

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Modi is playing with people's emotions'