the tone used by mr.Prabhanjan Butshikan in his posts somehow give me a feeling that he is a muslim using a hindu name on this board. this statement clearly proves this:
"J&K has Muslim majority. Still it had a Hindu King! But that rascal refused to merge with India. Muslim Shaikh Abdulla was demanding merger with India & the Hindu king was not willing. With that experience, why should Kashmiris have a Hindu CM? For gaddari?"
anyways, i dont care about who he is, but, all his opinions are biased towards the muslims. you need to grow up in a muslim dominated city to know what the muslims are upto. i am from hyderabad and i know what happens there in reality.
for any citizen, it should be country first, then state or city and then religion. but, in the case of muslims, its always religion(qaum) first, mohalla next and country comes in the very end of the chain.
vedanti is a one off sadhu who issued a fatwa. otherwise, have u ever heard of any other sadhu or someone issuing a fatwa ever before? on the other hand, we can see every other mullah or muslim leader issuing some fatwa or the other against someone or the other every other day. the tragedy is no one ever questions these fatwas.
some mullah sitting in calcutta issues a fatwa against tasleema nasreen. what did our so called "SECULAR GOVERNMENTS" in west bengal and the center do? any actions?
