If so, why did the learned Judge of TADA, Mumbai convict him? He is an outstanding member of Judiciary who has gone through every inch of the documents presented to him by the CBI and has given his final verdict. Further, Sanjay is not a child to be coersed by the Investigating Agency and his confession of possession of banned arms for his self-protection does not carry any water. If so, why did he try to destroy the AK-57 rifle? If the arms were dumped in his Car Shed, was it not his bounden duty to immediately inform his father who was an MP and to the nearest police station about this? Why did he remain silent? These questions even a modern day child will be amused to ask. Let us not say Justice is impartial - but say only to elite and powerful.
