Why does this Mahesh Peri want to ignore motives. If we see the kind of revelations which Tehelka brings out every now and then, always it is the opposition which is targetted. So why not impute that they are receiving funds from the congress...or worse from the terrorists themselves masquerading as human right(or wrong) activists. Does he mean to say that it is only coincidental that not a single sting has targetted the congress. Or does he mean to say that there are no skeletons in the Congress's cupboard. So once some motive is suspected/insinuated and with some reason it naturally follows that the sting is not objective but was made in such a way to show everthiong in a negative way.
But then why should anybody respond to this Mahesh guy at all since he belongs to that great mouthpiece of congress...OUTLOOK.;) Now if this is a mere insinuation just read a couple of their issues and all will be clear even to the dumbest person. And what does that great Congress mouthpiece do in every issue...is it not attributing motives/insinuations all the time.
