It is not "woman helping a woman". It's a business. Going by Dr. Patel's arguments (i.e. "One woman who comes to me needs a child," she continues, "and another woman needs money. A woman is helping a woman. What's wrong?"...) one man need sexual pleasure and one woman needs money what's wrong? So prostitution is better. Disagree on that? Why? Because here a woman is helping a man? Further...what if the mother in future claims right on the child? No one can deny the custody legally if she is determined to take the child back. Further who will marry the woman who has done this surrogate mother nonsense. For a mere 25000, the unmarried woman will remain so for life. At least no "good" man will marry her. By the way can Dr. Patel marry off her son to a woman who has been a surrogate mother?
