It is really funny to hear Vanzara repeatedly saying that the victim of hs fake encounter was a terrorist.Assuming and not admitting that he was a terrorist what authority has this DIG has to kill even a terrorist unless he attempeted to kill the DIG? the person whom he calls a terrorist seems tohav been in his custody.If such a person attempetd top escape or escaped from hios custody , the DIG is to blame as an useless or incompetent person and should be dismissed outright evn ewithout enquiry under atricle 110 of the constitution of India . Another imporant aspect that the entir enation should in this case is that the DIG in this case I think , should be a person who has been appointed toservice onthe bais of caste and not on merit.The media would do weel toexamine this aspect whenever some highly placed government official behaves unlawfully and in an idiotic manner . the very fact that the DIG has been repeating that the victim of his fake encounter was a errorist seems to convey an impression that any person whom the policemen considers tobe a terroris can b killed by the police and hat in this particular case the DIG admits that he killed the victim as in his decision the victim was a terrorist.the dIG has also in attempt to destroy evidence killed another person and the wife of the victim. Such officials should be destroyed in the same way they have killed the victims .this man and his accomplices should not be allowed to live on ths earth even for a moment . The caste aspect deservges to be examined to assess the damage such a policy has done to the nation.
