Infact it is the presence of people like Chennas Namboodirippadu that de-secrate the Guruvayoor Temple, not the visit of Ravikrishna or anyone for that matter. Infact Ravikrishna & family can take the tantri to court for redressing their hurt. Even on the occassion of his marriage the then tantri(uncle of this present tantri) conducted a punyaham. Both families should have taken the tantri to court. But the tantri went & met Vayalar Ravi and Ravikrishna's inlaws at their house and pleaded "Please don't take me to he court as I have three daughters to be married". Unfortunately his request was heeded to. Infact both should've demanded a regret and a 'prayaschitham' from the tantri for refraining from legal action. Now they are facing the consequences of allowing the uncle to go scot free. The nephew has spitted on them. Unless the tantri is brought to book by legal re-course there is no remedy. People who pose on this board as apostles of Hinduism please note that tolerance is the basic pillar of Hinduism. A priest cannot behave like a God. Those who want to know what the word Brahmin means kindly refer to the episode in the epic of Mahabharath where Lord Yama tests his son Yudhishtira with questions(during the Vanvaas of The Pandavas). Read out the reply Yudhishtira gives for the query "Who is a real brahmin?" and then think whether the two tantris of Guruvayoor Temple fit in that bracket or not.
