Freedom of expression certainly permits criticism of religious beliefs. It does not confer a fundamental right to abuse any religion or its founder. In a theological debate or a philosophical discussion one may legitimately criticise the tenets of a particular religion or a particular person who beleives that religion. For example, the occurrence of miracles. One may also doubt the factual basis of its claims and assert that they are historically inaccurate. But it is not permissible to condemn the founder of a religion or the prophets it venerates as immoral persons or frauds and charlatans. In such cases an inference of deliberate intention of outraging the religious feelings can be raised and which is punishable under Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code. Whether we like it or not, in India religious feelings are easily ruffled by scurrilous attacks on religion and the founder and central figures of that religion.
