Sub: - India to stop humbug on Tibet and to launch official forum.
Ref: - India under legal obligation towards Tibetans, China & UN.
------------------------
This refers to controversy about visit of Dalai Lama to Australia where China objected Dalai Lama's meeting with Head & Ministers of Government and other political leaders of Australia.
But India's silence on this issue is deafening and India's behavior violates the tenets of International law as given below especially in view of the fact that as per information available on the webs site http://www.tibet.com Dalai Lama is running Tibetan Government in exile on the soil of India at Dharamsala:-
(i)- When India has already accepted Tibet as part of China and when Dalai Lama himself does not seek Tibet's independence then how can India allow Tibetan Government in exile on its soil?
(ii)- Moreover, is the example of Pakistan occupied Kashmir not enough (where possession of territory by Pakistan for the last 60 years is practically irreversible) to enlighten India that similar long possession of Tibet by China is also irreversible?
(ii)- When Dalai Lama himself is reportedly seeking merely 'autonomy' (whatever it may mean to him) where Tibetan culture, language, environment, economical interests etc. shall be preserved then-
(A)- Why is India allowing Dalai Lama to talk any thing beyond this which impinges on China's territorial integrity?
