Dear Tanthri, U claim to have studied the Vedas. R u aware of Mimansa principles of Interpretation? These r compulsory for any student of Vedas. This statement of yours is regarded by Mimansists as Dosha(defect) being illogical and self-contradictory: "The problem was with Ravikrishna, who is the son of a Christian mother and thus presumed to be a non-Hindu.
As per the prescribed rites of the temple, we are supposed to carry out a punyaham when we know that a non-Hindu has entered the temple,..." The basis of the tanthri's knowledge of ravi krishna's faith is only his presumption nothing else. Presumption of a fact does not lead to knowledge of a fact.
