1.Sanjay is supposed to be out on probation. During that period he should not be drinking. The article states that he has been drinking. Punishable Offence. 2. Sanjay would have been in jail all these years. It is only because of his family agreed to pay Shiv Sena that he is out on bail. 3. Just like all who were involved in the arms transactions (arms & ammunition that were given to him) have been booked under TADA, he too should have been booked under it. 4. General people are forgetting the act of 1993. Just because there is 50/100 crores riding on him OR just because he has a daughter does not mean that he should be pardoned. If thats the case all those who had lost their lives in 1993 and also those who have been sentenced also have daughters/families. Do we excuse all of them? 5. Judiciary shoud,re-check again on what basis he had been let out on bail.
