Dear Sir, I do't agree that only tag of being Muslim, makes one terrorist.Here one should see whether the award of TADA's court to Sanjay is within the parameters of court's juridiction or not? I feel that the award is illegal and with out jurisdiction.My points are:
1/ TADA court has not found any evidence against Sanjay under TADA ACT, and accordingly,he was acquited under all the sections of TADA ACT.
2/ Sanjay was only held guilty under Arms Act.
Now,question arises,when Sanjay was not held guilty under TADA ACT,how could his intention be brought in issue, while deciding his case for keeping weapons with out licence.It appears that injustice has been caused to him. More over,the another quistion arises as to whether the TADA COURT is empowered to try cases under ARMS ACT.If not,why SANJAY's case was not transfered to crimal court after he was acquited under TADA ACT,for trial under Arms Act? I my opinion,the TADA COURT does't have jurisdiction to pass sentence under Arms Act when intention of the accused is not connected with terrorist's activities. SUO MATTO this case may be taken by higher court of the country in the interest of the justice and fair play.
