Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Perceived bias of the media against Gujarat
by natraj tanjore on Jul 06, 2007 10:29 PM

Your head line reads :
Khafeel was brainwashed with Gujarat riot tapes

The actual lines in your own text :
They also said during his stint with the SIO both in Davangere and Bangalore, he was shown extensive footage of the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, the Mumbai riots of 1993, the Gujarat riots of 2002, and also of the Iraq war. The friends believe he may have been asked to carry out the attack in London [Images] as retaliation for the UK's involvement in the Iraq war.

Isnt there a mischief and sensationalism with an ulterior motive of projecting gujarat and its government in a bad light? Your text clearly talks of babri masjid and Mumbai riots, and the snapping point is mentioned as UK involvement in the Iraq war! THEN WHY THE HEADLINE SHOULD SCREAM Khafeel was brainwashed with Gujarat riot tapes?

Please report objectively! Lets not forget congress ruled India for a long 45 years before they were dethroned and the other parties inherited the liability and the legacy of the Congress! If the present Gujarat Government is perceived to be a hitler like state, how come all the communities are living together, conducting business as usual and there have been, God bless, no civic disturbances since 2002 - Compare this with the statistics around the country, especially Tamil Nadu, where a CM's illegitimate son goes around attacking commercial establishments, taking away lives and still manages to avoid the hands of law! How come the media is silent on these issues?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Why did Khafeel Ahmed turn?