Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:Adam Bridge
by Neutral on Jul 04, 2007 08:00 PM


To Shivakumar Singh:
When I meant sins, I meant the discrimination. Otherwise, the 2.5% were very much clean. I agree with you that the sins committed by 2.5% is nothing before sins committed by other segments. But, Periyar very cleverly played with the anti-2.5% sentiments and was able to hide the sins committed by others. Whatever it may be, we should now tell them that there is no "rational" to still speak of the sins committed by forefathers of 2.5%. Thus they can avoid hatered which was seeded by Periyar

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Ramar Sethu, a heritage centre?