bjp did not get majority, so there was no question of their building ram temple in a coalition, with inteligentia of our country always branding bjp as communal due to their support for hindus. only bjp and shiv sena talk about hindus. all other parties go for muslim appeasement. so u do not have a choice for another hindu party, except in maharashtra.
as regards kalam, though he is a muslim, but he is a secular muslim and he also has praise for gita. that is the reason educated persons of the whole country love him, irrespective of caste and religion. do not b so meanminded in this age of science.
u r wrong in saying that only brahmins support bjp, as bjp is the only refugee camp for them. in reply to the second part of your statement, pl note that mayawati has captured power in up with the help of brahmins only, so it should b clear to u that brahmins support all parties. they r not vote bank of any party, as is the case with muslims.
as regards reply to the first part of your statement, if brahmins only support bjp, how it got 55 seats in up, when many brahmins supported mayawati and some other brahmins must have supported other parties also? in that case bjp would not have opened its tally at all.
in up, congress got only 22 seats. what do u have to say about that?
by supporting patil, shiv sena is not doing anything good for the hindus. they r voting patil, not bcoz she is a hindu, but bcoz he is a marathi manus. this is meanmindedness.
