Sorry to read language of a 'well known' supreme court lawyer, Indiara Jaishing seems to be defending the established gorillas of public intrest, that is the NGOs and activists who write occasional novels, and draw salary and fame in name of public intrest.
We were informed that supreme court was bestowed with the power to decide on such issues as rights etc in that constitution. There is no issue here.
How is the laws formulated by the political parties, lot of whom are run by gozillas feeding from foreign funds, becomes the aspiration of the nation ? It seems as if the author defending defending dictatorial demagougy and skirting the issues of misuse by the gozillas.
How are the lawyers and specially the group of activist lawyers getting invitation from ford foundation or chinese propaganda are affected by these ?
