Samir Haziq, First of all do not talk about values. Before you talk about British, we have to goback and talk about muslim rule in India. For 500 years they kept India backward and made it a poor country and it is very easy to British to conquer India. But there was at least development during british rule in just 200 years and much more development in the last 60 years once India became independent, despite we bearing the burden of Muslims. About communal violence in muslim rule - is there any free speech and newspapers in muslim rule? Despite all their bad deeds, there was a free press to a great extent in British Rule. The british were fools to keep just dissenting voices in jail. The muslim just killed the people. Hence there was no communal violence. Once there was freedom to some extent during british rule and then after indepenence, the muslims got what they deserve. As far as we Indians are concerned, both british and muslims are invaders. You have your origins elsewhere. The sikhs are always Indians because they have their origins in Inida. The muslims are not Indians because their origins are elsewhere. You are in India at the mercy of Hindus. India and Pakistan was one country for thousands of years - true, but at that time, the people were all Hindus. Once the muslims from arab world invaded, they forcebly converted Hindus and increased their population. India can grow much faster, if muslims are not here!
