I See lots of REMARKS here like " This message has been reported for abuse. The moderator's final decision is awaited. Show message" or "This post has been permanently removed following an abuse alert."And I am curious about the criterea of ABUSE. Doesnt anything baselessly said against Hindu comunity, religion, society, people, organizations or personalities amounts to ABUSE? Lots of messeges I read and never saw any bad thing in that are later REMOVED by saying REPORTED ABUSIVE. Many of those messeges are just facts and not comments to be called abusive. Thats why I wonder what is the definition of ABUSE really. Not single Hindu sentiments hurting messege get deleted but anything aganist slam get deleted immediately. It seems abusing Hindus or Hinduism does not fit in definition of ABUSE. As it is same on mainline media. If sentimets are supressed this way it will explode the way Gujarat happen. If sentiments didnt allow to vent they explode. Gujarat was mass explosion of setiments. When masses feel nobody to care about them or their sentiments they come out on road as mob and take law in their hands. Retaliation by masses and terror acts of tiny little group are two differant things. Hiding or supressing such truth dont stop such explosions but make them more distructively explosive. Hindu sentiments in this country are supressed by political system, media and all other means. If few of them sending angree messeges allow them to vent their anger, which helps to subside it. Dont supress or bulldoze that anger in form of messege and force it to turn explosive. Anybody listening?
