Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:RE:RE:RE:Whether Islam or Aurangzeb
by mohammed uddin on Feb 17, 2007 03:16 PM

CHANGE IS INEVITABLE
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE
Is my reply to this article.
I would not have made my comments on this article, had I not seen VANDE MATARAM,
if vandemataram describes the MOTHER LAND as NATION IS GOD, or I PRAY LAND, or I BOW BEFORE LAND then I do not sing that rubbish.
I do distinguish the diff. between GOD and LAND, though I am ready to sacrifice my life for the protection of my BIRTH LAND but I am not stupid to call the LAND AS GOD, I am firm believer that HUMAN BEING is superior among all creations / creatures, rest all are servants of HUMANBEING.
I do not pray, SUN, MOON, EARTH, STAR, FIRE, WATER, LAND, TREE, STONE, GENETALS.
If this gets clear, then the article itself nullifies
Assuming that my forefather had I forcible conversion, I do not mind, because now at this age I equally distinguish the difference in between ISLAM and other religion, and I got pride to be a MUSLIM, because ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY is my GOD who is free from all SHAPES, I need not have to give shape to my GOD so as to concentrate, if I am doing that I am distorting the image of GOD at my whelms and fancies whom I have not seen.
Coming to AURANGZEB
When INDIA obtained INDEPENDENCE under its CONSTITUTION it was written that STATUSQUO shall be maintained, that mean if a structure on that day of independence is a TEMPLE, then shall remain as temple, and if a structure is a MOSQUE shall remain so, irrespective of that building%u2019s or land%u2019s history.
This clause is mature enough while viewing MASS and dealing with, because how long one can live in the past ??, how for some one can go back, and find the history and authenticity of the history??. Today it%u2019s a mosque yesterday was a temple day before could have been a mosque or a Buddhist temple???. Therefore STRIKING POINT is essential, and was successfully done at the time of INDEPENDENCE OF INDAI, by the people with knowledge, foresight and value based politicians.
What all happened in ayodhya has gone endless, and created hatred in two communities.
This proposed exhibition will not yield good result, except added hatred.
I DO NOT ADVOCATE ALL DOINGS OF AURANGZEB

Coming to JAZIYA the tax, every nation has same practice, in the form of SALES TAX, INCOME TAX, ENTERTAINMENT TAX, and all DIRECT and INDIRECT TAXES.
At the era of Aurangzeb MUSLIMS were paying ZAKATH and non Muslims JAZIYA.

Author of this article is praising WOMEN WITH OPEN FACE, WATCH TV, FILMS

MODESTY IS personal choice, its good to be house lady than a Fashion Model
Does any religion advocates a lady and a gentleman to act as wife and husband, once they are not, even on screen ???.
SOCIENTAL EVILS ARE ROOT CAUSE OF FILMS.
Should I prolong saying that how our Indian females are giving off their clothes oflate, is this not the gift of WATCHING TV, and FILMS???.





    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb