Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:RE:RE:RE:Real reason behind Aurangzeb
by Governor General on Feb 18, 2007 06:33 AM

I don't understand what you are trying to say.

Your post has two points.

1. You are plainly stating what happened.

2. You are abusing me.



There is no analysis in your post.

I'll ignore your abuse and answer your points.

Did you strive to think why Tamil Nadu was least affected by Muslims? Is it because NorthIndian kings gave their lives saving Tamil state? What do you mean by others took the brunt?

Mysore under Tipu Sultan was a British period occurance. The dynamics of a Indian foot soldier (Hyder Ali) taking over a Kingdom was different from a surrender of an existing kingdom at the sound of march of Alien kings.

Bahmini states were never allowed to stabilize in Deccan because of various resistance provided by SouthIndians (Vijayanagar is a glorious example). That's what was lacking in North India. One Turk general comes and then the entire North India falls at his feet. It gets followed by an Afghan general..Punjab to Bengal falls to his feet. That's what I am commenting here.

Does stating these facts makes me a Communist? Don't show your immaturity. I am an entrepreneur surviving solely 'coz of Capital markets and open economy.

I don't belong to any brigades.. I apply my mind.

The manner in which you speak.. looks like you are a person brainwashed by some ideology.





    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb