Hello Srinivas, I'm not saying whether the article is correct or not. I not even once say that Auranzeb was a good man or he was a bad man. My main intention is to make people realise that instead of discussing a historical topic, they are discussing about religion. If anyone wants to discuss about Aurangeb, it should be done without emphasizing that "he did this coz he was a muslim and he did not do this coz he wasnt a hindu". A discussion about history shouldnt involve religion.
