It has been said and proved time and again that those who refuse to learn from history are bound to repeat it. Why are we afraid to revisit our history just because it is unpalatable, specially if it puts muslims in bad light? Till Muslims of India fail to separate their past from Moghuls and link it to their Hindu ancestory, they will feel that any attack on Aurangzeb is any attack on Muslim community which is not right. We lapped up history thrown at us by British and still take it as reference point, even when it is now well known that it was doctored to suit their evil designs of divide and rule. But, we condemn Mr. Francois just because he is French? Why is person who speaks is, now, more important than the truth? Why messanger is being condemned and not the message? Let us grow up.
