I just want to understand what the author wants to project by this article. I see no point in arguing about some wretched emperor who ruled India some 400-500 years ago. He probably did some bad things. It doesn't mean that 1) All the Muslims at that time were with him or 2) All the Hindus today need to seek revenge for what he did.
This article is trying to add fuel to the already existing tensions between the two communities. Please stop this and let us behave like mature individuals.
