Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
The Truth about Auranbzeb
by rafiuddin farooqui on Jul 09, 2007 03:37 PM

Just think a man such, character, calibre who cares and concern for public can be unjust, cruel. Just imagine A King such cruel and unjust to the Majority could rule a huge country, for about 50 years, where majority members serving highest position and comprising 80% in the Military.


He was so pious best character person noble and just. You cannot find a single one in the present leaders.

1. His personal piety, however is undeniable he led an exemplary simple pious life.

He care for the Royal Treasury as Public Treasury and for public. The present leaders considers Public treasury to personal Treasy.

2. Unlike his predecessors, Aurangzeb did consider the royal treasury as a trust of the citizens of his empire and did not use it for personal expenses.

He was subedar in Deccan and Gujarat. He did not destroy any Temple, His period was peaceful and prosperous, called Golden Period.

3. Despite more than two decades he campaign as Subedar in Deccan and Gujarat there is no record of temple destruction in the region. He continued to confer Jagirs to Hindu Temples. His period was golden period and relatively peaceful, prosperous in his tenure.

He was maligned that he was against art and Music. He was the accomplished musician playing VEENA. (He banned all Ashlil Nangey Nude dances )

4. Surprisingly he is well accomplished in playing VEENA stringed instruments.(Music Instrument)

Many historians accepted that the lies against Aurangzeb invented.


    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb